 |
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Lucinda Bateman MD
Click here for
printable copy
The following discussion is based on published CFS research combined with my
own experience and study of CFS, and should be considered a working hypothesis:
CFS is a condition defined by the presence of chronic fatigue that results in
significantly decreased function, that is of definite onset (not lifelong), not
readily explained by an identifiable underlying medical or mental health
condition, and usually accompanied by some or all of the following symptoms:
impairment of memory or concentration, headaches, muscle or joint pain,
unrefreshing sleep, sore throats, tender lymph nodes and post exertional flare
of symptoms. See discussion of Case Definitions at the end of the handout.
CFS may occur in a "genetically predisposed" individual, who is
often challenged by, or, "run
down" by ordinary or unusual "life stressors," and may start with a "flu
syndrome" that seems to leave chronic symptoms and fatigue rather than resolving
in a normal fashion. Epidemiologic studies suggest that a large number of people
who meet criteria for CFS may not have distinct flu-like onset of symptoms.
The exact cause of CFS is unknown. No single infection has been proven a
primary cause of CFS, although many viral and atypical pathogens have been
studied as possible primary or secondary co-factors. Research suggests that
patients with CFS have mildly suppressed Natural Killer Cell activity and cell
mediated immunity Th1 (probably abnormal CD4 activation of CD8 viral killing), with
a shift toward upregulated Th2 mediated immunity. In the later stages of
illness patients have more B-cell derived illness such as "allergy" symptoms, upregulated antibody systems (antithyroid and antinuclear antibodies), and
abnormal cytokine release. Flow cytometry studies of lymph node biopsy
show chronically activated T-cells (compared to peripheral blood) consistent
with this chronically up-regulated state. It is not clear if recurrent or latent
virus(s) are currently present and driving the system, if it is chronically
"immune" driven, or if there are other involved processes extrinsic to the
immune pathways.
Many patients have significant autonomic nervous system dysfunction, manifest
by orthostatic intolerance or postural orthostatic tachycardia (POTS), sweating
or temperature intolerance, Sicca syndrome (dry eyes and mouth), irritable bowel
and gastric reflux, bladder spasm, etc. Neurocognitive and neuropsychological
symptoms are often prominent, and flare as the symptom complex flares. Abnormal
sleep patterns with alpha intrusion, abnormal Stage III, IV and REM phases are
often present. In addition, Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis
dysfunction has been documented as relatively low CRH, cortisol, and perhaps a contribution
to the marked orthostatic intolerance or Neurally Mediated Hypotension (NMH)
documented on Tilt Table testing. Numerous forms of brain imaging have
demonstrated regional flow abnormalities (SPECT), areas of hypometabolism (PET),
and areas of nonspecific demyelination or infarct (MRI). In addition these areas
of research, genetic studies in twins and affected families show a
familial predisposition to developing CFS.
Since the cause of CFS is still unknown, the best general treatments
at this point for the illness complex and associated symptoms are to:
Additional recommendations apply on an individual basis:
- --If primary or secondary viral or
bacterial infection or known immune dysfunction (allergies and asthma)
can be identified, treating the condition might reduce CFS symptoms.
---If orthostatic intolerance is prominent, it may respond partially
to standard interventions such as oral fluids (2 liters of water daily), sodium
(2–4 gms per day) and electrolyte supplementation, fludrocortisone (Florinef)
0.1-0.2 mg daily, a trial of midodrine 2.5-10 mg 3 to 4 times a day
while up and active (i.e. not while sleeping or resting).
—Replacing identifiable hormone deficiencies can be useful in
modulating symptoms, but should be monitored carefully due to the known
potential side effects associated with each hormone.
---Stimulants and Provigil are occasionally helpful, but should be
used cautiously because of impact on sleep, anxiety, and the tendency to over
exert instead of pace appropriately.
---Anti-depressant, anti-anxiety and anti-convulsant medications can be
helpful for some aspects of the syndrome, including pain modulation independent of affect on mood.
EVERY prominent or focal symptom
should be investigated and treated in a supportive manner,
both at onset and at appropriate intervals while ill, to
exclude other conditions.
The 1988 (CDC or Holmes) CFS Case Definition (or "Working Case Definition of
CFS") requires that patients meet the Major Criteria of new
onset fatigue and fatigability that does not resolve with rest, that causes at
least a 50% reduction in activity, for at least 6 months, and the exclusion
of all other illnesses that can cause fatigue, including existing psychiatric
illness, and Minor Criteria of > 6 month duration, including at least
6 of 8 symptoms (fever, sore throat, painful lymph nodes, general
weakness, prolonged fatigue after exercise, headaches, arthralgia, sleep
disturbance, neuropsychological complaints, and sudden onset of symptoms complex)
and 2 signs (low grade fever, non-exudative pharyngitis, and palpable
or tender lymph nodes).
The 1994 "Revised Case Definition of CFS" (Annals of Internal Medicine,
December 1994, Fukuda diagnosis) is reached after a process of excluding other
illnesses and is defined as: clinically evaluated, unexplained persistent or
relapsing chronic fatigue of > 6 month duration, not otherwise explained by
another known medical or psychiatric condition (, of new or definite onset, not
the result of ongoing exertion, not substantially alleviated by rest, and
that results in substantial reduction in previous levels of function; plus
concurrent presence of (at least 4): impairment in short term memory or
concentration, muscle pain, joint pain, headaches of a new pattern or severity,
unrefreshing sleep, sore throat, tender cervical or axillary lymph nodes, and
post exertional malaise. Specific exclusions include: an ongoing medical
illness that can obviously cause such fatigue, psychiatric illness psychotic
features, dementia, anorexia or bulimia, alcohol or other substance abuse, and
obesity defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 45.
No Case Definition was intended to exclude patients from the diagnosis,
but rather to help identify and treat underlying problems, and to define a
better, more homogeneous, "CFS" group for research purposes. The larger
populations of patients with chronic fatigue, exertion intolerance, ill defined
pain, insomnia, cognitive dysfunction and other symptoms probably have a number
of underlying problems that include atypical presentation of known diseases,
combined processes, psychological factors, and disease processes we still poorly
understand.
Several other Case Definitions exist, including the "Canadian Case
Definition" formulated by a panel of experts from Canada and the US, that is
generally accepted as a better clinical tool than the 1988 and 1994 versions.
(This is published as "Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome:
Clinical Working Case Definition, Diagnostic and Treatment Protocols" in the
Journal of CFS; Vol.11, No 1, 2003.) The CDC has proposed an empiric case definition
based on further study of CFS patients identified in their epidemiological study
in Wichita, Kansas, but it may include four times as many people as the earlier
definition. A group of experienced clinicians wrote and the IACFS/ME
has sanctioned a Pediatric Case Definition that was published in the
Journal of CFS and can be found on the IACFS/ME website.
www.iacfsme.org
Mounting research in the last 10 years has clearly shown that in spite of
their weaknesses, all of the CFS Case Definitions successfully separate a
group of afflicted and often disabled patients who do not simply have a mood
disorder, poor motivation or any other readily identifiable disorder. These
patients deserve support and medical attention both clinically and on a research
basis until more data is forthcoming. Most likely, the CFS Case Definitions
encompass a group made of up more than one cause and combination of causes. More
work is needed to develop objective markers that will delineate subgroups of CFS
and related conditions such as fibromyalgia syndrome, multiple chemical
sensitivity syndrome, and others.
There is discussion about what else to call this complex and often disabling
condition, which is arguably not well served by the term Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome. In Europe and Canada, the term Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) was used
long before the CDC coined the term "CFS" in the mid 1980's. The
IACFS/ME has suggested that ME stand for Myalgic Encephalopathy. Patient advocates
in the U.S. often prefer the term "CFIDS" (Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction
Syndrome), a synonym for CFS. There is also considerable overlap with
Fibromyalgia Syndrome, a systemic condition defined by widespread pain instead
of fatigue. Much debate within the CFS community has focused
on when and what to better name the condition. At this point, most
researchers and clinicians hope that emerging information regarding
pathophysiology will help resolve the conflicts.
Updated 3/2009 |